There was a DSU (Durham Student Union) council meeting on Thursday at which the Environment and Ethics Officer proposed a thoroughly contentious motion – to boycott Israeli goods and majority-state-owned Israeli companies from the union premises as a protest against Israel’s human rights record, both in the recent disproportionately violent treatment of Gaza and in its treatment of conscientious objectors.
For those interested, the meeting’s documents can be found here, under the heading of ‘Thursday 22nd January’. The motion itself is contained within the Agenda file.
It was a long meeting and by the time that the union buildings had to be closed at 11:30pm, no consensus had been reached – a sufficient number of council reps had had to leave to catch buses that a vote would be meaningless. Quite what happens remains to be seen. There are calls for a university-wide referendum. There are calls for the motion to be kicked into the ground and ignored. Despite the best efforts of the DSU Exec to maintain a rational, measured discussion, it was inevitable that feelings were going to be running high, and one group of students in particular did themselves no credit by taking the discussion to a highly emotive and personal level.
There are arguments for, arguments against, and arguments why it should never have been brought up in the first place. Part of the problem is the general level of ignorance surrounding the exact technicalities of international and national human rights law, and while I hold up my hand there with most people, I’m afraid, it does not make for a productive discussion.
Those of you who know me and know my political views will probably know which side of the motion I supported – and here I would like to point out to any Facebook stalkers who have put two and two together that I would have held that opinion regardless of any personal ties or vested interests. As I wrote in an email to my college representative,
“This is not anti-Semetic. This is anti the abuse of basic human rights. Whether or not you agree with the Jewish cause for land, and whether or not you agree with national service this is about the freedom for innocent civilians to go about their lives in peace, and the freedom to stand up for one’s beliefs. If the latter in particular is not what a union should stand for and support, then I don’t know what is.”
Listening to this only reinforces my conviction (as well as being sheer genius on the part of Tony Benn :D)
I realise that even publishing this blog entry is risky in terms of the potential offence caused to readers. I have heard arguments going back and forth on the topic already. I’m happy to debate, and everything, but I suppose I didn’t post this to go over the pros and the cons of a boycott motion. I posted it as a reminder that sticking up for your beliefs is neither easy nor always black-and-white, but still fundamentally important if we dare to hope that the world can ever be a better place. Sometimes you just need to stand up and be counted.
Recent Comments